RAS Global AffairsСША & Канада: экономика – политика – культура USA & Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture

  • ISSN (Print) 26866730
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6045

US Policy for Building a Networked Region in the Pacific

PII
S2686673025030062-1
DOI
10.31857/S2686673025030062
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 3
Pages
72-85
Abstract
In the paper, US Pacific policy is analyzed through the concept of a “network”. On the one hand, systemic conditions which prevented the emergence of comprehensive integrational structures, and on the other hand, the results of George W. Bush’s policy served as foundations for such a course. By the end of 2008, three networks with US participation had formed: the TransPacific Partnership, the American alliances network and the six-party talks devoted to the nuclear issue of the Korean Peninsula. All of them served as a framework for Barck Obama’s Pacific policy. Its results demonstrated that a sparse network of security allies and partners with a limited number of nodes appeared was the most viable. As a consequence, this network was the only one maintained by Donald Trump and modernized by Joseph Biden. The modernization involved inclusion of non-regional actors into Pacific formats, closer integration of alliances and security partnerships through a partially corresponding agenda, the formation of multilateral partnership network based on a flexible cyber agenda, and assigning the role of network braces to the Quad and the trilateral US – Japan – ROK military and security partnership.
Keywords
США внешняя политика Тихий океан сеть Транстихоокеанское партнёрство Квад «четвёрка» Япония Республика Корея безопасность
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
16

References

  1. 1. Bogaturov, A.D. 1997. Velikie derzhavy na Tikhom okeane. Istoriia i Teoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v Vostochnoi Azii posle Vtoroi Mirovoi Voiny (1945–1995) [The Greate Powers at the Pacific Ocean. History and Theory of International Relations in East Asia after the Second World War (1945–1995). Moscow, Konvert – MONF. 352 p. (In Russ.).
  2. 2. Breslavets, A.A. 2007. Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskoe ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo: Otkrytyi regionalism – novyi vyzov sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation: An open regionalism – a new challenge to international relations system]. Vladivostok: VGUES Publ. 184 p. (In Russ.).
  3. 3. Dubinin, Yu.A. 2012. SEATO – fenomen voenno-politicheskogo soiuza na periferii kholodnoi voiny [SEATO – military-political alliance phenomenon at the cold war periphery]. In Mnogostoronnyaya diplomatoya b bipolyarnoi sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Multilateral Diplomacy in bipolar system of international relations], Ed. by N.I. Egorova. Moscow, Russian fund for Education and science. 464 p. pp. 127–156. (In Russ.).
  4. 4. Gelovani V.A. Britkov, V.B. Dubovsky, S.V. 2009. SSSR i Rossiia v globalnoi sisteme (1985–2030): Rezultaty Globalnogo Modelirovaniia [USSR and Russia in global system (1985–2030): Global modeling results]. Moscow, Librokom. 320 p. (In Russ.).
  5. 5. Hameiri, Sh., Jayasuriya, K. 2011. Regulatory Regionalism and Dynamics of Territorial Politics: The Case of Asia-Pacific Region. Political Studies. Vol. 59. Nо. 11. pp. 20–37.
  6. 6. Konkurentsiia mezhdu SShA i KNR: vozmozhnosti dlia Rossii [Competition between USA and PRC: opportunities for Russia], Ed. by D.A. Degterev. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2024. 300 p. (In Russ.).
  7. 7. Ludtke A. 2010. Istoriia povsednevnosti v Germanii: Novye podkhody k izucheniiu truda, voiny i vlasti [History of everyday life in Germany: New approaches to labor, war and power studies]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. 271 p. (In Russ.).
  8. 8. Nikitin A.I. 1987. Evolyutsiia amerikanskogo globalizma. Ideinaia bor’ba v SShA po voprosu o roli Ameriki v mire [Evolution of American globalism. U.S. ideological struggle on the issue of American role in the world]. Moscow, Nauka publ. 134 p. (In Russ.).
  9. 9. Osnovy teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: Opyt IMEMO v 1970-e gody [Frames of Theory of International Relations. IMEMO Experience in 1970-ths], Ed. by N.I. Inozemtsev. Moscoe, Aspekt Press, 2022. 623 p. (In Russ.).
  10. 10. Sakaki, A., Nishino, Ju. 2018. Japan’s South Korea predicament. International Affairs. Vol. 94. No. 4. pp. 735–754.
  11. 11. Satake, T., Hemmings, J. 2018. Japan – Australia security Cooperation in the bilateral and multilateral contexts. International Affairs. Vol. 94. Nо. 4. pp. 815–834.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library