- PII
- S2686673025020079-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S2686673025020079
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 2
- Pages
- 96-108
- Abstract
- U.S. Supreme Court Justice L.D. Brandeis holds a very special place in the development of American constitutionalism. Rarely has any figure in the judicial and legal community received such public recognition as Brandeis, who was called the "Robin Hood of Law" and the "Defender of the People". As a judge of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1916 to 1939, L.D. Brandeis made great efforts to develop the concept of a "living Constitution", affirm the constitutional principle of equality, guarantee labor and social rights for citizens, and protect the constitutional rights of women. His contribution to the formation of American sociological jurisprudence, in particular, legal realism, is invaluable. The views of L. Brandeis, which were based on the concept of social liberalism, limiting the dominance of monopolies, protecting workers, and safeguarding the interests of consumers, remain extremely relevant today.
- Keywords
- Верховный суд США Л.Д. Брандайз толкование конституции конституционные принципы Конституция США конституционные права
- Date of publication
- 17.09.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 12
References
- 1. Louis Brandeis & Samuel Warren The Right to Privacy, 4 Harvard Law Review (1890-1891): 193-220.
- 2. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
- 3. Time v. Hill, 385 US 374 (1967).
- 4. Privacy Act of 1974. Pub.L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896, enacted December 31, 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552.
- 5. Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Company, 50 S.E. 68 (Ga. 1905).
- 6. Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 474 (1928 г.)
- 7. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
- 8. Bartnicki v. Vopper, 532 U.S. 514 (2001).
- 9. Соединённые Штаты Америки. Конституция и законодательные акты / под ред. О.А. Жидкова. М., 1991. С.41.
- 10. Gilbert v. Minnesota, 254 U.S. 325, 338 (dissenting) (1920).
- 11. Brandeis, L. True Americanism (1915).
- 12. Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465, 477 (dissenting) (1921).
- 13. New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262 (dissenting) (1932).
- 14. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., 285 U.S. 393, 406-08 (dissenting) (1932).
- 15. Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919).
- 16. Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
- 17. Pierce v.United States, 252, U.S. 239 (1920) (dissenting)
- 18. Shaefer v. United States, 251 U.S. 266 (1920) (dissenting).
- 19. Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925).
- 20. Gilbert v. Minnesota, 254 U.S. 325, 338 (1920).
- 21. Adamson Act, Sept. 3, 5, 1916, ch. 436, 39 Stat. 721.
- 22. P.L. 249, 39 Stat. 675.
- 23. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254, U. S. 443.
- 24. Truax v. Corrigan, 257 U. S. 312.
- 25. NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others. 2013. NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others | US national security. The Guardian (date of access - 19.01.2025).
- 26. Берлявский Л.Г. Луис Брандайз и развитие конституционного права США. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2016. 240 с.
- 27. История США /отв. ред. Г.Н. Севостьянов. В 4-х т. М.: Наука, 1983-1987. Т.2. 1985, 600 с.; Т.3. М., 1985. 672 с.
- 28. Каленский В.Г. Билль о правах в конституционной истории США (историкокритическое исследование). М.: Наука, 1983. 279 с.
- 29. Конституция США: История и современность /под ред. А.А. Мишина, Е.Ф. Язькова. М.: Юридическая литература, 1988. 316 с.
- 30. Перова Н.А. Конституционно-правовое регулирование свободы слова в США и в Соединённом Королевстве Великобритании и Северной Ирландии. Автореферат диссертации н соискание степени кандидата юридических наук. М., 2013. 24 с.
- 31. Черниловский З.М. От Маршалла до Уоррена. Очерки истории Верховного Суда США. М.: Юридическая литература, 1982. 219 с.
- 32. Balkin, J.M., Levinson, S. The Canons of Constitutional Law, Harvard Law Review. 1998. Vol. 111: 964-1022.
- 33. Blasi, V. The First Amendment And The Ideal of Civic Courage: The Brandeis Opinion in Whitney v. California. Wm. & Mary Law Review. 1988. № 29: 653-697.
- 34. Bernstein, D. From Progressivism to Modern Liberalism: Louis D. Brandeis as a Transitional Figure in Constitutional Law, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 2029 (2014): 20292050.
- 35. MacAskill, E. Edward Snowden: how the spy story of the age leaked out. The Guardian , 12 June 2013.
- 36. Goodwin, L., Karlan, P., Schroeder, C. Keeping faith with the Constitution. New York, Washington DC, 2009. 272 p.
- 37. Lipkin, R.J. Constitutional Revolutions. Pragmatism and the Role of Judicial Review in American Constitutionalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press (2000). 367 p.
- 38. Rotenberg, M. Brandeis Broke Ground on Privacy Right. The New York Times. February 1, 1991.
- 39. Rohde, S.F. Louis D. Brandeis, Los Angeles Lawyer. January 2010: 45.
- 40. Schultz, D. Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. New York. (2005). 577 p.
- 41. Walker, J.M. jr. Judical tendencies in Statutory Construction: Differing views on the role of the Judge. NYU Annual Survey of American Law. 2001. Vol. 58: 204-240.
