A moral problem for theodicies
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
A moral problem for theodicies
Annotation
PII
S2072-07260000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
35-48
Abstract
One of the central problems in both contemporary philosophy of religion and ethics con­cerns the offensiveness of any theodicy, explanation and justification of suffering in the light of the tragic events in the history of the 20th century (to mention some of them, the two World Wars, the genocides at Auschwitz, in Cambodia, Rwanda). The author con­siders an essay by Emmanuel Levinas called “Useless suffering” in which Levinas presents one of the first attempts to construct a moral critique of theodicy. In order to re­construct Levinas’ argument, the author introduces two distinctions: a) theodicy of good­ness and theodicy of justice, b) theoretical and existential practices of theodicy. Levinas proposes a moral critique of the theodicy of just reward. He claims that it is immoral to justify suffering by a simple calculation of offences and punishments. He thus under­mines any attempt to construct such a theodicy. However, theodicy of goodness remains possible for Levinas, as it may express “non-indifference” to the other, openness to her suffering, readiness to show compassion and to provide help. The author claims that any existential theodicy presupposes a theoretical one, and any moral critique must target the theoretical theodicy. In the final part of the paper, the author establishes a stronger and a weaker version of possible moral criterion for theodicy and argues that while the stronger version might prohibit any intellectual practice, the weaker one is applicable to both theoretical and existential theodicies and defenсes.
Keywords
Emmanuel Levinas, “Useless suffering”, theodicy, evil, suffering, moral crite­rion for theodicy
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
658
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Ammicht-Quinn, R. Von Lissabon bis Auschwitz: Zum Paradigmawechsel in der Theodizee­frage. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1992. 318 S.
  2. Levinas, E. “La souffrance inutile”, in: E. Levinas, Entre nous. Essais sur le penser-à-l’autre. Paris: Bernard Grasset, 1991, pp. 107‒120.
  3. Murray, M. “Teoditseya” [Theodicy], Oksfordskoe rukovodstvo po filosofskoi teologii [The Ox­ford Handbook of Philosophical Theology], ed. by T.P. Flint and M.K. Rei; trans. by V.V. Vasilev. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury Publ., 2013, pp. 525‒556. (In Russian)
  4. O’Connor, D. “In Defense of Theoretical Theodicy”, Modern Theology, 1988, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 61‒74.
  5. Phillips, D.Z. The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God. London: SCM Press, 2004. 304 pp.
  6. Pinnock, S. Beyond Theodicy: Jewish and Christian Continental Thinkers Respond to the Holo­caust. New York, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002. 202 pp.
  7. Stiver, D. “The Problem of Theodicy”, Review and Expositor, 1996, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 507‒517.
  8. Stoeber, M. Reclaiming Theodicy: Reflections on Suffering, Compassion and Spiritual Transfor­mation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 143 pp.
  9. Surin, K. Theology and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986. 180 pp.
  10. Swinburne, R. “Sushchestvovanie Boga” [The Existence of God], trans. by M.O. Kedrova. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury Publ., 2014. 464 pp. (In Russian)
  11. Swinburne, R. “Trebovaniya k udovletvoritel’noi teoditsee” [The Requirements for a Satisfac­tory Theodicy], Problema zla i teoditsei [The Problem of Evil and Theodicy], ed. by V.K. Shokhin. Moscow: IPh RAS Publ., 2006, pp. 174‒187. (In Russian)
  12. Thiel, J.E. God, evil and innocent suffering: A Theological Reflection. New York, NY: The Cross­road Publishing Company, 2002. 192 pp.
  13. Tilley, T. The Evils of Theodicy. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1991. 279 pp.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate