Везде
ADAPTATION OF THE TEST "ATTITUDE TO OBSERVANCE OF MORAL STANDARDS" ON THE SAMPLE OF RUSSIAN STUDENTS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ADAPTATION OF THE TEST "ATTITUDE TO OBSERVANCE OF MORAL STANDARDS" ON THE SAMPLE OF RUSSIAN STUDENTS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000329-8-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000329-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Rezazadeh  ELVIRA GILEMKHANOVA LARISA BAYANOVA
Abstract
The results of adaptation of the test “Attitude to Observance of Moral Norms” (by A.L. Zhuravlev,A.B. Kupreychenko) applied for the category of students are presented. The wording of a number of questionshas been rephrased to match substantively the student environment, while preserving the common semanticcore of moral judgments. The principle of total scoring of points for each item is proposed, which makesit possible to work with a quantitative rather than a nominal scale. The psychometric characteristics of theadapted version of the test are given: reliability, validity, discrimination. Statistical limits of norms arerevealed. Differences in the attitude to observance of the specific moral standards in modern Russian studentsare shown. The possibility of using the presented version of the test in further studies is evaluated.
Keywords
moral standards, convergent validity, reliability, discriminatory power, internal homogeneity, students.
Number of purchasers
8
Views
624
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Anastazi A. Psihologicheskoe testirovanie: v 2 t. / A. Anastazi.
Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. V. 2. P. 256. (in Russian)
2. Bajanova L.F., Popov L.M., Prohorov A.O. Kazanskij period v
tvorchestve V.N. Ivanovskogo // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2016.
V. 37. № 3. P. 105–112. (in Russian)
3. Bezmenova I.K., Gulevich O.A. Attitjudy i ih vzaimosvjaz’ s povedeniem. Referativnyj obzor. Moscow: RPO, 1999. P. 144.
(in Russian)
4. Bratus’ B.S. Psihologija i jetika / B.S. Bratus’. Moscow, 2008.
S. 55. (in Russian)
5. Volovikova M.I. Lichnost’ kak sub#ekt stanovlenija nravstvennogo i pravo vogo soznanija // Psihologija individual’nogo i
gruppovogo sub#ekta / Ed. A. V. Brushlinskogo i M. I. Volovikovoj. Moscow: Per Sje, 2002. (in Russian)
6. Zhuravlev A.L, Poznjakov V.P., Vavakina T.S. Orientacija na
principy i normy social’nogo vzaimodejstvija kak faktor psihologicheskogo otnoshenija k delovomu partneru. // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 1. P. 5–15. (in Russian)
7. Zhuravlev A.L., Kuprejchenko A.B. Nravstvenno-psihologicheskaja reguljacija jekonomicheskoj aktivnosti. Moscow: Izd-vo
“Institut psihologii RAN”, 2003. S. 436 (in Russian)
8. Kozlova M.A., Kozlov A.I. Istoki morali, orientirovannoj na individa i gruppu: social’no-psihologicheskij i estestvenno-nauchnyj aspekty. // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2016. V. 37. № 3.
P. 60–70 (issledovanie moral’noj sfery posredstvom identichnosti). (in Russian)
9. Latynov V.V. Psihologicheskie zakonomernosti ob#jasnenija nejetichnyh postupkov. // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. V. 36.
№ 1. P. 61–70. (in Russian)
10. Metodika ocenki urovnja razvitija moral’nogo soznanija (Dilemmy L. Kolberga) / Diagnostika jemocional’no-nravstvennogorazvitija. Red. i sost. I.B. Dermanova. St. Petersburg, 2002.
P. 103–112. (in Russian)
11. Metodiki diagnostiki i izuchenija nravstvennoj sfery lichnosti /
Sostavitel’ L.A. Zakirzjanova. Kazan’: Otechestvo, 2013. P. 135.
(in Russian)
12. Mnogourovnevyj lichnostnyj oprosnik “Adaptivnost’” (MLOAM) A.G.Maklakova i S.V.Chermjanina / Prakticheskaja psihodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy. Uchebnoe posobie. Ed. i sost.
Rajgorodskij D.Ja. Samara, 2001. P. 549–558. (in Russian)
13. Nravstvennost’ sovremennogo rossijskogo obshhestva: psihologicheskij analiz / Ed. A. L. Zhuravlev, A. V. Jurevich. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2012. P. 413.
(in Russian)
14. 〈Pis’mo〉 Minobrnauki Rossii ot 22.12.2015 N 07-4351
“O napravlenii metodicheskogo kompleksa dlja provedenija social’no-psihologicheskogo testirovanija” Rezhim
dostupa: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.
cgi?req=doc&base=EXP&n=670875#0 (Data obrashhenija:
30.10.17). (in Russian)
15. Popov L.M., Ustin P.N., Golubeva O.Ju. Dobro i zlo v jeticheskoj psihologii lichnosti. – Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii
RAN”, 2008. P. 240. (in Russian)
16. Sinjagin Ju.V. Rukovoditel’ organizacii i ego komanda (teoreticheskaja model’). Moscow: RAGS, 1996. P. 112.
(in Russian)
17. Bayanova L.F., Mustafin T.R. (2016). Factors of compliance of
a child with rules in a Russian cultural context. European Early
Childhood Education Research Journal, 3(2), 355–368.
18. Bayanova L.F. , Tsivilskaya E.A., Bayramyan R.M., Chulyukin K.S.
(2016) A cultural congruence test for primary school students // Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. V. 9.
№ 4. Р. 94–105.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate