Везде
LA VANGUARDIA COMO FENOMENO "FRONTERIZO". EL ENFOQUE DE UN LATINOAMERICANISTA
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
LA VANGUARDIA COMO FENOMENO "FRONTERIZO". EL ENFOQUE DE UN LATINOAMERICANISTA
Annotation
PII
S0044748X0000617-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yakov Shemyakin 
ORCID: 0000-0003-2382-0864
Affiliation:
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
81-97
Abstract
The article is a reflection on those problems, which were given to the scientific community by a team of authors published in 2010, the two-volume research "Avant-garde in the culture of the XX century (1900-1930).): The The-ory. The History. Poetics". Y.G.Shemyakin fully shares informed in the book of understanding of the avant-garde, not only as a phenomenon of art, but also as a global cultural-historical complex, which also includes the proper ideology and a set of certain way oriented social and political practices, and also supports the thesis on the unity of the system of the avant-garde. At the same time, it proposes their own concept of the avant-garde type of system, using the heuristic potential of the concept of the "borderline" civilizations.
Keywords
avant-garde, system approach, "borderline" situation, "borderline" civilization, "borderline" type of system, dual (binary) opposition, ambivalence, syncretic type of a creative personality
Date of publication
01.06.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
974
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Avangard v kul'ture XX veka (1900-1930 gg.): Teoriya. Istoriya. Poehtika, v 2 kn. M., 2010.
    2. 

  2. Avangard v kul'ture XX veka.., kn. 1, s. 4-5.
    3. 

  3. V. N. Sadovskij. Sistemnosti printsip. - Novaya filosofskaya ehntsiklopediya. M., 2001, t. 3, s. 558.
    4. 

  4. Ya. G. Shemyakin. Latinoamerikanskaya tsivilizatsiya i latinoamerikanskaya literatura - Izvestiya RAN. Seriya literatury i yazyka. M., 2006, tom 65, № 4, s. 33.      
    5. 

  5. «Granitsa (protsess perekhoda i tip sistemnosti)». - ONS, 2009, № 5, s. 112-124.     
    6. 

  6. V. B. Zemskov. Kul'turnyj sintez v Latinskoj Amerike: kul'turologicheskaya utopiya ili kul'turoobrazuyuschij mekhanizm? - Latinskaya Amerika, 1999, № 4, s. 97.  
    7. 

  7. Zh. Le Goff Tsivilizatsiya srednevekovogo Zapada. M., 1992, s. 9-123.            
    8. 

  8. Ya.G. Shemyakin. V poiskakh smysla. Iz istorii filosofii i religii. M., 2003, s. 5-8, 243-429.        
    9. 

  9. Ya.G. Shemyakin. Evropa i Latinskaya Amerika: Vzaimodejstvie tsivilizatsij v kontekste vsemirnoj istorii.
    10. 

  10. Avangard v kul'ture XX veka.., kn. 1, s. 37.
    11. 

  11. Ya.G. Shemyakin. Evropa i Latinskaya Amerika: Vzaimodejstvie tsivilizatsij v kontekste vsemirnoj istorii. M., 2001,
    12. 

  12. Ya.G. Shemyakin. Rossiya v zapadnom vospriyatii (spetsifika obrazov «pogranichnykh» tsivilizatsij). - ONS, 2008, № 1, s. 133-144              
    13. 

  13. O.D. Shemyakina. Vlast' linii v rossievedenii i nelinejnyj kharakter rossijskogo khaokosmosa. - ONS, 2008, № 2, s. 92-103.               
    14. 

  14. N.A. Berdyaev. Dusha Rossii. - Russkaya ideya. M., 1992, s. 297
    15. 

  15. N.O. Losskij. Kharakter russkogo naroda, kn. 1-2. M., 1990
    16. 

  16. V.N. Il'in. Ehsse o russkoj kul'ture. SPb., 1997, s. 41, 60 i dr.
    17. 

  17. G.D. Gachev. Obraz v russkoj khudozhestvennoj kul'ture. M., 1981, s. 68, 70  
    18. 

  18. A.S. Akhiezer. Rossiya: Kritika istoricheskogo opyta, t. 1- 3. M., 1991
    19. 

  19. I.V. Kondakov. Vvedenie v istoriyu russkoj kul'tury. M., 1997     
    20. 

  20. Tsivilizatsii i kul'tury. M., 1994, vyp. 1, s. 61
    21. 

  21. L. Sea. Filosofiya amerikanskoj istorii. M., 1984, s. 176-185
    22. 

  22. O. Paz. El laberinto de la soledad. México, 1981, p. 47-48, 57-88.
    23. 

  23. Ya.G. Shemyakin, O.D. Shemyakina. Puti i usloviya dostizheniya tselostnosti tsivilizatsionnoj sistemy. Sopostavlenie istoricheskogo opyta Rossii i Latinskoj Ameriki, ch. 1-2. - Latinskaya Amerika, 2009, № 9, s. 4-20; № 10, s. 82-101.  
    24. 

  24. E. B. Rashkovskij. Tsivilizatsionnyj diskurs v istorii mysli i praktiki. - Tsivilizatsii v globaliziruyuschemsya mire. Predvaritel'nye itogi mezhdistsiplinarnogo proekta. M., 2009, s. 15.
    25. 

  25. V.V. Ivanov Chyot i nechet. Asimmetriya mozga i znakovykh sistem. M., 1978; A.S. Akhiezer. Trudy. M., 2006, s. 432-433.
    26. 

  26. S. S. Averintsev. Poehtika rannevizantijskoj literatury. M., 1997, s. 250, 252.    
    27. 

  27. A.R. Radcliff-Brown. Method in social Anthropology. Bombay, 1973, p. 103
    28. 

  28. Eh. Lich. Kul'tura i kommunikatsiya. Logika vzaimosvyazi simvolov. K ispol'zovaniyu strukturnogo analiza v sotsial'noj antropologii. M., 2001, s. 128.                 
    29. 

  29. Ya.G. Shemyakin. Vera i ratsio v dukhovnom kosmose latinoamerikanskoj tsivilizatsii. - Latinskaya Amerika, 2007, № 3, s. 78-92       
    30. 

  30. Ya.G. Shemyakin, O.D. Shemyakina. Sootnoshenie very i ratsio v tsivilizatsionnom «pogranich'e»: rossijskie paralleli latinoamerikanskogo opyta. - Latinskaya Amerika, 2007, № 11, s. 58-77.          
    31. 

  31. «Istoriya literatur Latinskoj Ameriki». M., 1985,1988, 1994, 2004, 2005.
    32. 

  32. Ya.G. Shemyakin, O.D. Shemyakina. Puti i usloviya., s. 98.
    33. 

  33. I. V. Kondakov. Vvedenie v istoriyu russkoj kul'tury. M., 1997, s. 56.
    34.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate