Везде
Spatial Potential of Russia – Another Reason Not to Change Anything?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Spatial Potential of Russia – Another Reason Not to Change Anything?
Annotation
PII
S013216250021394-6-
DOI
10.31857/S013216250021394-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Dmitry V. Trubitsyn 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6192-6670
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Transbaikalian State University
Address: Russian Federation, Chita
Edition
Issue 8
Pages
95-104
Abstract

The article critically analyzes the project of development of Russia that includes using its geographical position between the two fast-developing economies of European Union and China. Revealing its weak spots, the paper states that the emphasis on similar projects as well as the continuous search for new development possibilities rather demonstrate the absence of development and another failure of modernization. Working out projects of social development demands for a set of conditions. Firstly, development has to be seen as a deep qualitative transformation, not as superficial changes and technological innovations. Secondly, we have to rely on the actual state of society, basing on competent and unbiased sociological studies. Finally, geography has to be theoretically integrated with sociology, given that human activity is responsible for development, not territory. All this is absent in the project under analysis. The author states that the actual state of the modern Russian society prevents it from fulfilling this project.

Keywords
social development, modernization, geographical position, social structures
Received
07.08.2022
Date of publication
26.09.2022
Number of purchasers
3
Views
32
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013216250021394-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 07.08.2022
Cite Download pdf

References

1. Baklanov P.Y., Tulokhonov A.K., ed. (2010) Borderline and trans-border territories of Asian Russia and neighbouring countries. Novosibirsk: SO RAN. (In Russ.)

2. Frolova Y.A., ed. (2010) Geopolitical potential of trans-border partnership of Asia-Pacific countries: Collective monograph. Vladivostok: Dalnauka. (In Russ.)

3. Gudkov L. (2022) Recurrent totalitarianism. Vol. 1. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)

4. Inozemtsev V.L. (2018) The Non-Modern Country. Russia in the 21st century world. Moscow: Alpina Publisher. (In Russ.)

5. Inozemtsev V. (2022) World without Russia. Institute of Modern Russia. 17 March 2022. URL: https://imrussia.org/en/analysis/3439-world-without-russia (accessed 25.06.2022). (In Russ.)

6. Kudrin A.L., Gurevich E.R. (2014) A New Growth Model for the Russian Economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki [Questions of Economics]. No. 12: 4–36. (In Russ.)

7. Rozov N.S. (2006). Cyclicity of Russian Political History as a Disease: is Recovery Possible? Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. No. 3: 8–28. (In Russ.)

8. Rozov N.S. (2006) The phenomenon of transboundedness in historical and geopolitical perspective. Transgranich'e v izmenyayushchemsya mire: Rossiya – Kitaj – Mongoliya [Transboundedness in the changing world: Russia – China – Mongolia]. Chita: 109–113. (In Russ.)

9. Selivanov A.I. (2008) Opposing civilizations and construction of Russia's future. Sotsiologicheskie issledovniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 21–26. (In Russ.)

10. Simonyan R.H. (2022) Spatial potential of Russia in the context of economic integration of Europe and Asia. Sotsiologicheskie issledovniya [Sociological Studies]. (In Russ.)

11. Tulokhonov A.K., ed. (2012) Positioning of Baikal region territories in the context of transboundedness. Novosibirsk: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate