<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">USA &amp;amp; Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>USA &amp;amp; Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">26866730</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian Academy of Science</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S268667300008882-0</article-id><title-group><article-title>Formation Mechanism of the American Public Diplomacy’s Strategy</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Механизм выработки стратегии публичной дипломатии во внешней политике США</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-9291</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Artamonova</surname><given-names>Uliana</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Артамонова</surname><given-names>Ульяна Звиадиевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>artmanova@mes.su</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт мировой экономики и международных отношений РАН</institution><institution xml:lang="en">Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-04-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>109</fpage><lpage>119</lpage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of this article is to examine and to analyze the formation mechanism of the American public diplomacy’s strategy. Author explores and compares the concepts of “public diplomacy” and “foreign-oriented propaganda” with regard to the modern foreign policy of the US. After examining the terminology of the relevant official documents author suggests that the term “public diplomacy” is being used by the American officials as an euphemism for the term “propaganda” Analyzing the US strategic documents author identifies the main state institutions, responsible for the development of public diplomacy goals and objectives and the institutions, responsible for their implementation. In addition, author identifies the efficiency assessment procedure for those departments. Finally, author discovers the form of interconnection between those agents in the framework of the public diplomacy strategy’s formation process. Throughout the research author has discovered that few actors play the main role in the formation of the American public diplomacy’s strategy: State Department, Department of Defense, Presidential Administration (who is responsible for constructing the unified plan) and president of the United States himself as it remains up to him to approve this plan. Article highlights the deep incorporation of foreign-oriented propaganda into the American foreign policy strategic planning. Therefore author suggests that propaganda is an integral part of all American foreign policies regardless of whether those policies concern relationships with allies, partners or rivals. Author concludes that even though D. Trump’s administration demonstrates less interest in foreign-oriented propaganda comparing to the previous ones, the successful mechanism of American public diplomacy is unlikely to deteriorate any time soon due to the described incorporation into the system of political planning.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья посвящена исследованию механизма выработки стратегии публичной дипломатии в США. В ней раскрывается содержание понятий и различия между «публичной дипломатией» и «внешнеполитической пропагандой» в современной американской политике. На основе анализа стратегических документов США автор выделяет основные государственные институты, ответственные за формулировку целей и задач публичной дипломатии, очерчивает круг исполнителей, определяет процедуру оценки их эффективности и устанавливает, в какой взаимосвязи они находятся между собой в рамках означенного процесса. Особое внимание в работе уделено глубокой инкорпорации пропаганды в процессы стратегического планирования американской внешней политики. Автор также делает вывод о потере интереса к инструменту внешнеполитической пропаганды со стороны администрации Д. Трампа, но полагает этот фактор недостаточным для реальной деградации успешного механизма американской публичной дипломатии в обозримом будущем.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Public diplomacy</kwd><kwd>propaganda</kwd><kwd>strategic communication</kwd><kwd>strategy</kwd><kwd>planning</kwd><kwd>institutions</kwd><kwd>State Department</kwd><kwd>Department of Defense</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Публичная дипломатия</kwd><kwd>пропаганда</kwd><kwd>стратегическая коммуникация</kwd><kwd>стратегия</kwd><kwd>планирование</kwd><kwd>институты</kwd><kwd>Госдепартамент</kwd><kwd>Минобороны США</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>B1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cull N. 2008. &amp;apos;Public Diplomacy&amp;apos; Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Snow N., Taylor P.M., eds. New York: Routledge. 404 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cull N. 2008. &amp;apos;Public Diplomacy&amp;apos; Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Snow N., Taylor P.M., eds. New York: Routledge. 404 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>B2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nye J. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. 208 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nye J. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. 208 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>B3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gregory B. 2005. Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communication: Cultures, Firewalls, and Imported Norms. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference on international communication and conflict. George Washington University and Georgetown University. Washington, D.C. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.112.7338&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gregory B. 2005. Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communication: Cultures, Firewalls, and Imported Norms. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conference on international communication and conflict. George Washington University and Georgetown University. Washington, D.C. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.112.7338&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>B4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U.S. National Strategy for Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communication. Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy Policy Coordinating Committee (PCC). 2007. Available at: https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/87427.pdf (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">U.S. National Strategy for Public Diplomacy and Strategic Communication. Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy Policy Coordinating Committee (PCC). 2007. Available at: https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/87427.pdf (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>B5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">National framework for strategic communication. White House. 2010. Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&amp;amp;did=27301 (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">National framework for strategic communication. White House. 2010. Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&amp;amp;did=27301 (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>B6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Update on National framework for strategic communication. White House. 2012. Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?view&amp;amp;did=704809 (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Update on National framework for strategic communication. White House. 2012. Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?view&amp;amp;did=704809 (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>B7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Public Diplomacy: Strengthening U.S. Engagement with the World. A Strategic Approach for the 21st Century. Report. Office of the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs of the United States. 2010. Available at: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/legacy/pdfs/PD_US_World_Engagement.pdf (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Public Diplomacy: Strengthening U.S. Engagement with the World. A Strategic Approach for the 21st Century. Report. Office of the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs of the United States. 2010. Available at: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/uscpublicdiplomacy.org/files/legacy/pdfs/PD_US_World_Engagement.pdf (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>B8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board, 2004. P.12-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board, 2004. P.12-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>B9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joint Publication 1-02: &amp;quot;Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms&amp;quot;, Washington D.C., 12 April 2001 (as amended through 17 March 2009).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Joint Publication 1-02: &amp;quot;Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms&amp;quot;, Washington D.C., 12 April 2001 (as amended through 17 March 2009).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>B10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U.S. Department of State. Official website. Available at: https://www.state.gov/ (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">U.S. Department of State. Official website. Available at: https://www.state.gov/ (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>B11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U.S. Department of Defense. Official website. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/ (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">U.S. Department of Defense. Official website. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/ (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>B12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">RAND Corporation. Official website. Available at: https://www.rand.org/topics/information-operations.html (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">RAND Corporation. Official website. Available at: https://www.rand.org/topics/information-operations.html (accessed 27.01.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>