<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">USA &amp;amp; Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>USA &amp;amp; Canada: Economics – Politics – Culture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">26866730</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">3034-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Russian Academy of Science</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31857/S268667300008877-4</article-id><title-group><article-title>The U.S. Presidential Elections 2020: Phase of Caucuses and Primaries</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Президентские выборы 2020 г.: первый этап</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8215-2101</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Travkina</surname><given-names>Natalya</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Травкина</surname><given-names>Наталья Михайловна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>travkina.n.m@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Институт США и Канады РАН</institution><institution xml:lang="en">Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies, RAS</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-04-10" publication-format="electronic"><day>10</day><month>04</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><issue>4</issue><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The first phase of party caucuses and primaries of the 2020 presidential кcampaign, which started on February 3 this year in Iowa, is analyzed. It is indicated that the phase of party caucuses and primaries will last 4 months and will end in early June this year. After that, the parties will hold party congresses: the Democratic party in July in Milwaukee (Wisconsin), and the Republican party in August in Charlotte (North Carolina). It is noted that in the Republican party the current president D. Trump is an uncontested candidate who will be definitely nominated by the Republican party for run for U.S. President. The most interesting are caucuses and primaries in the Democratic party, which so far have put forward two main candidates – the former U.S. Vice President in the Obama administration from 2009 to 2017 J. Biden and Senator from Vermont B. Sanders. From the very beginning of the presidential race the leadership of the Democratic Party embarked on the path of the maximum possible opposition to the candidacy of B. Sanders and providing of all kinds of support, including using the administrative resource, for J. Biden. The general concept of opposition to B. Sanders is that by the opening of the Democratic Party Congress in July 2020 he would not get the necessary 1991 votes of the pledged delegates needed to nominate him in the first round of кelections, and thus decide the fate of the Democratic party candidate within so called “Contractual congress”, when the main role will be played by the behind-the-scenes agreements of the party’s leadership and its main sponsors, which most likely, would approve the candidacy of J. Biden. In this scenario, the presidential race in the Democratic party would кbe very similar to the 2016 presidential campaign, when H. Clinton and B. Sanders fought for the presidency, but if during the last Presidential election a large split in the ranks of the Democrats was avoided, then during the current campaign the likelihood of a split between the center and the left, populist flank is very high with all the possible consequences for the outcome of the general presidential election on November 3, 2020.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Анализируется стартовавший 3 февраля в штате Айова первый этап президентской кампании 2020 г. – этап партийных собраний и первичных выборов. Указывается, что он продолжится четыре месяца и закончится в начале июня. Затем партии проведут национальные съезды: Демократическая партия – в июле в городе Милуоки (штат Висконсин), Республиканская партия － в августе в городе Шарлотте (штат Северная Каролина). Отмечается, что действующий президент Д. Трамп является безальтернативным претендентом в кандидаты от Республиканской партии и будет выдвинута на пост президента США на съезде в августе. Наибольший интерес представляют партийные собрания и первичные выборы в Демократической партии, которые обозначили двух основных претендентов － бывшего вице-президента США в администрации Б. Обамы с 2009 по 2017 г. Дж. Байдена и сенатора от штата Вермонт Б .Сандерса. С самого начала президентской гонки руководство Демократической партии встало на путь максимально возможного противодействия Б. Сандерсу и всяческой поддержки, в том числе с использованием административного ресурса, Дж. Байдена. Общая концепция противодействия Б. Сандерсу состоит в том, чтобы к июлю, к началу съезда Демократической партии, он не набрал 1991 голоса делегатов в первом туре голосования, необходимых для его выдвижения в кандидаты на съезде. Если и Байдену не удастся набрать необходимого количества голосов делегатов съезда, вопрос о кандидате в президенты от Демократической партии должен быть решен в рамках так называемого «договорного съезда», когда основную роль будут играть закулисные договорённости руководства партии и её основных спонсоров, которые, по всей видимости, утвердят кандидатуру Дж. Байдена. В рамках этого сценария президентская гонка у демократов была бы весьма похожа на кампанию 2016 г., когда за выдвижение на пост президента боролись Х. Клинтон и Б. Сандерс. Однако если на прошлых президентских выборах большого раскола в рядах демократов удалось избежать, то в ходе нынешней кампании вероятность раскола между центром и левым, популистским флангом, весьма высока со всеми возможными последствиями для итогов президентских выборов 3 ноября 2020 года.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>2020 presidential election</kwd><kwd>Republican Party</kwd><kwd>Democratic Party</kwd><kwd>caucuses</kwd><kwd>primaries</kwd><kwd>D. Trump</kwd><kwd>J. Biden</kwd><kwd>B. Sanders</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>президентские выборы 2020</kwd><kwd>Республиканская партия</kwd><kwd>Демократическая партия</kwd><kwd>партийные собрания</kwd><kwd>первичные выборы</kwd><kwd>Д. Трамп</kwd><kwd>Дж. Байден</kwd><kwd>Б. Сандерс</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>B1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bain R. and Parris J., 1973. Convention Decisions and Voting Records. Washington: Brookings Institution, x + 470 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bain R. and Parris J., 1973. Convention Decisions and Voting Records. Washington: Brookings Institution, x + 470 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>B2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">(5) DeRentis H. Is Bernie Sanders Now Unstoppable? The National Interest, February 18, 2020. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/bernie-sanders-now-unstoppable-124541</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">(5) DeRentis H. Is Bernie Sanders Now Unstoppable? The National Interest, February 18, 2020. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/bernie-sanders-now-unstoppable-124541</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>B3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2020 Democratic Presidential Preference Primary Election Night Reporting: Unofficial Results. SCVotes.org. March 2, 2020. Available at: https://www.enr-scvotes.org/SC/100517/Web02-state.241406/#/ (accessed 4.03.2020). </mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2020 Democratic Presidential Preference Primary Election Night Reporting: Unofficial Results. SCVotes.org. March 2, 2020. Available at: https://www.enr-scvotes.org/SC/100517/Web02-state.241406/#/ (accessed 4.03.2020). </mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>B4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aleem Z. Rep. Jim Clyburn’s endorsement gave Biden some serious momentum in South Carolina. The majority of voters said the endorsement was an important factor in their decision. Vox, March 1, 2020. Available at: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/1/21159961/south-carolina-primary-biden-win-clyburn (accessed 4.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aleem Z. Rep. Jim Clyburn’s endorsement gave Biden some serious momentum in South Carolina. The majority of voters said the endorsement was an important factor in their decision. Vox, March 1, 2020. Available at: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/1/21159961/south-carolina-primary-biden-win-clyburn (accessed 4.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>B5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bacon P. Why Buttigieg Dropped Out. FiveThirtyEight, March 1, 2020. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-buttigieg-dropped-out/ (accessed 4.03.2020). Isenstadt A.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bacon P. Why Buttigieg Dropped Out. FiveThirtyEight, March 1, 2020. Available at: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-buttigieg-dropped-out/ (accessed 4.03.2020). Isenstadt A.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>B6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brookings. Hais M. and Winograd M. The future is female: How the growing Isenstadt A. political power of women will remake American politics. February 19, 2020. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2020/02/19/the-future-is-female-how-the-growing-political-power-of-women-will-remake-american-politics (accessed 4.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brookings. Hais M. and Winograd M. The future is female: How the growing Isenstadt A. political power of women will remake American politics. February 19, 2020. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2020/02/19/the-future-is-female-how-the-growing-political-power-of-women-will-remake-american-politics (accessed 4.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>B7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeRentis H. Is Bernie Sanders Now Unstoppable? The National Interest, February 18, 2020. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/bernie-sanders-now-unstoppable-124541 (accesed 4.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeRentis H. Is Bernie Sanders Now Unstoppable? The National Interest, February 18, 2020. Available at: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/bernie-sanders-now-unstoppable-124541 (accesed 4.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>B8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iowacaucuses. Caucuses History. Available at: https://data.desmoinesregister.com/iowa-caucus/history/#2016/gop (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iowacaucuses. Caucuses History. Available at: https://data.desmoinesregister.com/iowa-caucus/history/#2016/gop (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>B9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Isenstadt A. Trump drives massive turnout in primaries despite token opposition. His campaign is fine-tuning its get-out-the-vote machine months ahead of the general election — a daunting challenge for Democrats. Politico, 02.16.20. Available at: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/16/trump-campaign-voter-turnout-115338 (1.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Isenstadt A. Trump drives massive turnout in primaries despite token opposition. His campaign is fine-tuning its get-out-the-vote machine months ahead of the general election — a daunting challenge for Democrats. Politico, 02.16.20. Available at: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/16/trump-campaign-voter-turnout-115338 (1.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>B10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jones J. Trump Job Approval at Personal Best 49%. February 4, 2020. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/284156/trump-job-approval-personal-best.aspx/ (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jones J. Trump Job Approval at Personal Best 49%. February 4, 2020. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/284156/trump-job-approval-personal-best.aspx/ (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>B11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grim R. The Unfiltered Thoughts of Voters Who’ve Switched Candidates. The Intersept, February 2, 2020. Available at: https://theintercept.com/2020/02/02/voters-switched-candidates/ (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grim R. The Unfiltered Thoughts of Voters Who’ve Switched Candidates. The Intersept, February 2, 2020. Available at: https://theintercept.com/2020/02/02/voters-switched-candidates/ (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>B12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kondikln K. The Iowa Chaos: A Preview of July? Muddled, delayed, and confusing result could end up contributing to more of the same down the road. Sabato’s Crystal Ball, February 6, 2020. Available at: http://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/the-iowa-chaos-a-preview-of-july (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kondikln K. The Iowa Chaos: A Preview of July? Muddled, delayed, and confusing result could end up contributing to more of the same down the road. Sabato’s Crystal Ball, February 6, 2020. Available at: http://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/the-iowa-chaos-a-preview-of-july (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>B13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krantz L. South Carolina is supposed to be Joe Biden’s firewall. How’s that going these days? The Boston Globe, February 21, 2020. Available at: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/02/21/nation/south-carolina-is-supposed-be-joe-bidens-firewall-hows-that-going-these-days/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krantz L. South Carolina is supposed to be Joe Biden’s firewall. How’s that going these days? The Boston Globe, February 21, 2020. Available at: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/02/21/nation/south-carolina-is-supposed-be-joe-bidens-firewall-hows-that-going-these-days/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>B14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levy P. Trump’s Greatest Trick Was Convincing Voters That Women Can’t Win Elections. How we became a nation of amateur sexism handicappers. Mother Jones January 29, 2020. Available at: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/01/elizabeth-warren-amy-klobuchar-electability/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levy P. Trump’s Greatest Trick Was Convincing Voters That Women Can’t Win Elections. How we became a nation of amateur sexism handicappers. Mother Jones January 29, 2020. Available at: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/01/elizabeth-warren-amy-klobuchar-electability/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>B15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manchester J. and Parnes A. Buttigieg set to endorse Biden. The Hill, 03/02/20. Available at: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/485510-buttigieg-set-to-endorse-biden.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manchester J. and Parnes A. Buttigieg set to endorse Biden. The Hill, 03/02/20. Available at: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/485510-buttigieg-set-to-endorse-biden.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>B16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Manchester J. and Won S. Establishment Democrats rallying behind Biden. The Hill. 03.02.20. Available at: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/485612-establishment-dems-rallying-behind-biden.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Manchester J. and Won S. Establishment Democrats rallying behind Biden. The Hill. 03.02.20. Available at: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/485612-establishment-dems-rallying-behind-biden.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>B17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marcus D. Trump’s New Hampshire Turnout Number Is Simply Astounding. Federalist, February 12, 2020. Available at: https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/12/trumps-new-hampshire-turnout-number-is-simply-astounding</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marcus D. Trump’s New Hampshire Turnout Number Is Simply Astounding. Federalist, February 12, 2020. Available at: https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/12/trumps-new-hampshire-turnout-number-is-simply-astounding</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>B18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Medina J. &amp;amp; Herndon A. How Bernie Sanders Dominated in Nevada. The New York Times, February 23, 2020. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/02/23/how_bernie_sanders_dominated_in_nevada_502375.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Medina J. &amp;amp; Herndon A. How Bernie Sanders Dominated in Nevada. The New York Times, February 23, 2020. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2020/02/23/how_bernie_sanders_dominated_in_nevada_502375.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>B19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Parker B. &amp;amp; Brady D. Assessing the Prospects for a Brokered Convention. RealClear Politics, February 13, 2020. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/02/13/assessing_the_prospects_for_a_brokered_convention_142386.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Parker B. &amp;amp; Brady D. Assessing the Prospects for a Brokered Convention. RealClear Politics, February 13, 2020. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/02/13/assessing_the_prospects_for_a_brokered_convention_142386.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>B20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Real Clear Politics. Polls. Election 2020 — Democratic Delegate Count. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/democratic_delegate_count.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Real Clear Politics. Polls. Election 2020 — Democratic Delegate Count. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/democratic_delegate_count.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>B21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">RealClearPolitics. Polls. South Carolina Democratic Presidential Primary. February 29, 2020. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/sc/south_carolina_democratic_presidential_primary-6824.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">RealClearPolitics. Polls. South Carolina Democratic Presidential Primary. February 29, 2020. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/sc/south_carolina_democratic_presidential_primary-6824.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>B22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Real Clear Politics. Polls. 2020 Democratic Popular Vote. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/democratic_vote_count.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Real Clear Politics. Polls. 2020 Democratic Popular Vote. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/democratic_vote_count.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>B23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saad L. Democrats Thinking Strategically About 2020 Nominee Choice. November 19, 2019. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/268448/democrats-thinking-strategically-2020-nominee-choice.aspx (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saad L. Democrats Thinking Strategically About 2020 Nominee Choice. November 19, 2019. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/268448/democrats-thinking-strategically-2020-nominee-choice.aspx (accessed 1.03.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>B24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schneider E. Klobuchar to drop out of 2020 campaign, endorse Biden. Politico, 03.02.20. Available at: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/02/klobuchar-to-drop-out-of-2020-campaign-endorse-biden-118823.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schneider E. Klobuchar to drop out of 2020 campaign, endorse Biden. Politico, 03.02.20. Available at: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/02/klobuchar-to-drop-out-of-2020-campaign-endorse-biden-118823.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>B25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Timm J. and Egan P. South Carolina exit polls: Black and moderate voters fuel Biden to victory. NBS News. March 1, 2020. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/south-carolina-exit-polls-more-black-moderate-voters-turn-out-n1146046.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Timm J. and Egan P. South Carolina exit polls: Black and moderate voters fuel Biden to victory. NBS News. March 1, 2020. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/south-carolina-exit-polls-more-black-moderate-voters-turn-out-n1146046.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>B26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Democratic delegate rules, 2020. Democratic pledged delegates over time by primary election date, 2020. Ballotpedia. Available at: https://ballotpedia.org/Democratic_delegate_rules (accessed 3.02.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Democratic delegate rules, 2020. Democratic pledged delegates over time by primary election date, 2020. Ballotpedia. Available at: https://ballotpedia.org/Democratic_delegate_rules (accessed 3.02.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>B27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iowa Democratic Party. IDP Caucus 2020 Results. 100% reporting (1765 of 1765 precincts). Available at: https://results.thecaucuses.org/ (accessed 3.02.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iowa Democratic Party. IDP Caucus 2020 Results. 100% reporting (1765 of 1765 precincts). Available at: https://results.thecaucuses.org/ (accessed 3.02.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>